🔗 Share this article

Thhese days showcase a quite distinctive situation: the pioneering US parade of the babysitters. Their attributes range in their skills and characteristics, but they all share the common mission – to stop an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of Gaza’s unstable peace agreement. After the conflict concluded, there have been scant occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the ground. Only this past week saw the likes of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and Marco Rubio – all coming to carry out their roles.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In just a few days it initiated a wave of operations in Gaza after the killings of a pair of Israeli military personnel – resulting, according to reports, in many of local fatalities. Several officials urged a renewal of the war, and the Israeli parliament passed a initial resolution to take over the occupied territories. The American response was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the US leadership seems more focused on maintaining the current, uneasy stage of the truce than on moving to the subsequent: the rehabilitation of Gaza. When it comes to that, it seems the US may have aspirations but no specific plans.

Currently, it is unclear at what point the proposed international administrative entity will actually begin operating, and the same applies to the designated peacekeeping troops – or even the identity of its members. On Tuesday, Vance said the United States would not dictate the composition of the international force on Israel. But if the prime minister's government persists to dismiss various proposals – as it acted with the Turkish offer lately – what happens then? There is also the reverse issue: who will establish whether the forces favoured by Israel are even interested in the assignment?

The issue of the duration it will need to neutralize the militant group is equally vague. “The expectation in the administration is that the global peacekeeping unit is going to now take charge in disarming Hamas,” stated Vance lately. “It’s will require a while.” Trump further reinforced the lack of clarity, declaring in an interview recently that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to lay down arms. So, theoretically, the unidentified participants of this still unformed global force could arrive in Gaza while the organization's fighters continue to hold power. Would they be dealing with a administration or a militant faction? These represent only some of the concerns arising. Some might question what the result will be for ordinary civilians in the present situation, with Hamas persisting to focus on its own adversaries and critics.

Current developments have once again emphasized the blind spots of local journalism on the two sides of the Gaza frontier. Each publication attempts to analyze each potential aspect of Hamas’s breaches of the peace. And, typically, the reality that Hamas has been stalling the repatriation of the bodies of slain Israeli hostages has dominated the coverage.

By contrast, reporting of non-combatant fatalities in Gaza caused by Israeli strikes has received minimal attention – if at all. Consider the Israeli counter actions following a recent southern Gaza event, in which a pair of troops were lost. While local sources stated dozens of casualties, Israeli news pundits questioned the “light answer,” which hit only installations.

That is nothing new. Over the recent few days, Gaza’s press agency charged Israeli forces of violating the peace with the group 47 times since the truce came into effect, resulting in the loss of dozens of Palestinians and harming an additional many more. The assertion appeared unimportant to most Israeli media outlets – it was merely ignored. Even information that eleven members of a local family were killed by Israeli soldiers recently.

Gaza’s civil defence agency reported the group had been attempting to go back to their dwelling in the a Gaza City neighbourhood of Gaza City when the vehicle they were in was fired upon for allegedly passing the “boundary” that marks areas under Israeli army control. This boundary is invisible to the ordinary view and is visible just on plans and in government documents – not always accessible to average residents in the territory.

Yet that event hardly received a reference in Israeli media. One source referred to it in passing on its digital site, quoting an IDF spokesperson who said that after a suspicious car was identified, forces discharged warning shots towards it, “but the transport continued to approach the forces in a manner that posed an immediate danger to them. The troops opened fire to eliminate the risk, in line with the ceasefire.” No injuries were reported.

Amid this perspective, it is little wonder a lot of Israelis believe Hamas solely is to at fault for infringing the ceasefire. This perception threatens fuelling demands for a stronger stance in the region.

At some point – perhaps sooner than expected – it will not be adequate for US envoys to act as kindergarten teachers, telling the Israeli government what not to do. They will {have to|need